| Is the Community Reinvestment Act responsible for the govt bail out of the mortgage industry? ?

Is the Community Reinvestment Act responsible for the govt bail out of the mortgage industry? ?

Obama Hood - Spread the Wealth asked:


The Clinton administration has turned the Community Reinvestment Act, a once-obscure and lightly enforced banking regulation law, into one of the most powerful mandates shaping American cities—and, as Senate Banking Committee chairman Phil Gramm memorably put it, a vast extortion scheme against the nation’s banks. Under its provisions, U.S. banks have committed nearly $1 trillion for inner-city and low-income mortgages and real estate development projects, most of it funneled through a nationwide network of left-wing community groups, intent, in some cases, on teaching their low-income clients that the financial system is their enemy and, implicitly, that government, rather than their own striving, is the key to their well-being.

The CRA’s premise sounds unassailable: helping the poor buy and keep homes will stabilize and rebuild city neighborhoods. As enforced today, though, the law portends just the opposite, threatening to undermine the efforts of the upwardly mobile poor by saddling them with neighbors more than usually likely to depress property values by not maintaining their homes adequately or by losing them to foreclosure. The CRA’s logic also helps to ensure that inner-city neighborhoods stay poor by discouraging the kinds of investment that might make them better off.

The Act, which Jimmy Carter signed in 1977, grew out of the complaint that urban banks were “redlining” inner-city neighborhoods, refusing to lend to their residents while using their deposits to finance suburban expansion. CRA decreed that banks have “an affirmative obligation” to meet the credit needs of the communities in which they are chartered, and that federal banking regulators should assess how well they do that when considering their requests to merge or to open branches. Implicit in the bill’s rationale was a belief that CRA was needed to counter racial discrimination in lending, an assumption that later seemed to gain support from a widely publicized 1990 Federal Reserve Bank of Boston finding that blacks and Hispanics suffered higher mortgage-denial rates than whites, even at similar income level.

Basically this act gave people who could not afford loans a way to buy a home under the impression that home ownership will bring people out of poverty. See the story at:

http://www.city-journal.org/html/10_1_the_trillion_dollar.html

Related posts:

  1. I am looking for seed money to prepare a proposal suitable for lenders/equity investers in a retirement home? Jonathan L asked: This project would be in Greece, where...
  2. Best way to deal with convicted offenders? Probation? House arrest? Jail? Community service? Execution? John Hightower asked: Some people feel that sending someone to...

Filed Under Politics |

Tagged With , ,

Comments

One Response to “Is the Community Reinvestment Act responsible for the govt bail out of the mortgage industry? ?”

  1. meg on May 28th, 2009 3:27 am

    No. Poor people in this county do not get enough loans to bring down a medium size community bank. There is almost ten TRILLION in mortgaged backed securities in the capital markets, and they assume a default rate of about 1% when valuing them so to cause trouble the defaults must effect more than 100 billion dollars of mortgages. If you follow the housing market you would see that the biggest drop in home prices and the highest foreclose rates are in the suburbs especially in California, Florida, and the northeast and inner city prices are holding up much better.